The registration of a lis pendens will seriously restrict the manner in which the land in question can be dealt with.
The purpose of the registration is to put any third party on notice that there is ongoing litigation in relation to the property, and that this litigation may have an effect on the value of the property.
Concern
There is a growing concern from both solicitors and insolvency practitioners in relation to the lis pendens process – and its abuse, particularly by lay litigants.
Section 121 of the Land and Conveyancing Law Reform Act 2009 provides, among other things, for the registration of a lis pendens. The section further provides that the Central Office of the High Court shall keep a register of lis pendens affecting land.
Section 1 of the information booklet on registering a lis pendens in the High Court provides that the following documentation must be lodged in the Judgments Section of the Central Office in order to register a lis pendens:
- Form 31 in Appendix C of SI 149/2010 (€25 stamp duty is required on this document),
- A duplicate copy of the above form (no stamp duty required),
- A copy of the originating document (that is, summons or civil bill)
- A Form 64 of the Property Registration Authority rules is lodged if notification on the folio in the Property Registration Authority is required (pursuant to rule 128 of the Property Registration Authority rules)
- If the property is Registry of Deeds, a Form 16 must be lodged in the Property Registration Authority.
The registration of a lis pendens can be easily done, and there is no necessity to obtain leave from the court. An application is lodged in the High Court Central Office. There are minimal costs involved, and the effect of such a registration can be far reaching for the parties involved.
Effect of registration
A lis pendens puts potential purchasers and third parties on notice that there is ongoing litigation over a property that could ultimately reduce its value or affect the interest of the registered owner.
Potential purchasers will be reluctant to proceed with a sale when they discover that a lis pendens is registered. Certainly a prudent solicitor is unlikely to allow a client to purchase property so effected.
A lis pendens almost always has the effect of preventing the person holding the property from selling in the normal way.
Abuse of process
The registration of a lis pendens is increasingly being used by lay litigants/defaulting borrowers to frustrate the sale of charged property.
The registration of a lis pendens may be completed with no input from solicitors or counsel and no requirement to obtain leave of court. Applications are increasingly lodged in the High Court Central Office relying on a summons or civil bill containing a very limited and badly drafted indorsement of claim.
The proceedings themselves are often not pursued at all, and the summons is evidently only prepared to effect the registration of the lis pendens.
Steps required to vacate
In contrast to the straightforward application to register a lis pendens, the procedure to vacate is relatively onerous (unless on consent).
An application on notice must be brought before the court. In such an application, one of the issues that the court will consider is whether the criteria stipulated for the registration of the lis pendens under the Land and Conveyancing Law Reform Act 2009 were complied with. It must be noted that these criteria are not considered at the actual time of registration.
Because of this imbalance between registering and vacating a lis pendens, it is often the case that the process is abused by an aggrieved borrower for the purpose of frustrating the sale of a property by a receiver.
As a consequence, receivers often find themselves in the invidious position of having to seek injunctive relief from the court pursuant to section 123 of the 2009 act. Such a motion must be filed, return date obtained, and the various notice parties served. This, of course, includes the party who registered the lis pendens in the first place.
Notice parties will immediately file replying affidavits, causing the initial return date to be adjourned a number of times before a hearing date is ultimately obtained. The time and expense incurred needlessly is considerable. Even where a receiver successfully applies to court to release the lis pendens, another is often registered immediately thereafter, without any requirement for court approval.
Recent case law
There has been recent case law (Kelly & O’Kelly v IBRC and O’Connor v Cotter) where the courts have held that, where a party that registered a lis pendens is unable to definitively establish a proprietary interest in the property, this amounts to an absence of bona fides and, accordingly, the lis pendens should be lifted.
In Kelly, the Supreme Court – in upholding the judgment of the High Court – commented that it is important that, in the interests of justice, a party is entitled to register a lis pendens where appropriate and justified, and that it is not discreditable to do so.
The O’Connor decision arose on foot of various sets of proceedings involving the plaintiff, Mr O’Connor. In 2012, Bank of Scotland obtained a judgment against O’Connor in excess of €7.5 million relating to a property loan.
O’Connor, at the same time, instituted proceedings against the bank and registered a lis pendens on the property that was the subject of the bank’s proceedings. The lis pendens was subsequently removed by order of the High Court.
Shortly thereafter, O’Connor instituted fresh proceedings challenging the appointment of a receiver by the bank. He did not serve the proceedings, but registered a lis pendens on the property in an attempt to frustrate the receiver’s ability to sell it.
As soon as the receiver became aware of the proceedings, he immediately issued a motion in the High Court and was successful in having the proceedings dismissed, as they were deemed to be an “abuse of process”. This decision was upheld by the Court of Appeal.
When a lis pendens is registered based on unsustainable grounds, the affected party has an entitlement to apply to set it aside, but considerably more time, effort and cost is involved in the court application to set a lis pendens aside.
In Tola Capital Management LLC v Joseph Linders and Patrick Linders (No 2), the High Court stated that, in order to come within the statutory definition, a party seeking to register a lis pendens has to establish that:
- The plaintiff is claiming a proprietary interest in land,
- The defendant has an estate or interest in the land in which the plaintiff is claiming an estate or interest, and
- The proceedings themselves make a claim to a proprietary estate or interest in the said lands.
Therefore, if the proceedings pursuant to which a lis pendens has been registered are not being prosecuted bona fide, then, in such circumstances, a court should grant an order to have the lis pendens vacated.
Middle ground
It is becoming apparent that there is a requirement for the registration process of a lis pendens to be reviewed. It is clear from the case law that the court will not permit a lis pendens to be used as an attempt to frustrate a sale on unsustainable grounds. Equally, the legitimate interests of parties with an interest in land must be protected.
The problem is that a lis pendens can be obtained with almost no scrutiny of the application at all, and the time and expense to vacate it is grossly disproportionate.
An obvious middle ground would be that any application to register a lis pendens should include a motion for directions, which must be served upon the relevant notice parties before the return date.
The lis pendens could be effective from the date of filing, protecting the genuine interests of an applicant, but only confirmed by court order, protecting the interests of the notice parties. All parties’ interests are thus acknowledged and protected.